Difference between revisions of "Company"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→Summary) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Summary == | == Summary == | ||
− | Eventually, we'll likely want to set up a legal entity in a country of our choosing, in order to be able to conduct business in the plain old business | + | Eventually, we'll likely want to set up a legal entity in a country of our choosing, in order to be able to conduct business in the plain old business environment/bureaucracy set up by the world's nation states. |
Both the general (shareholding etc.) concepts for founding this company, as well as their specific implementation are undecided at the moment, and need some research first. Please add your notes, whenever you find yourself doing a little bit of that research or stumbling upon any facts that might be useful here! | Both the general (shareholding etc.) concepts for founding this company, as well as their specific implementation are undecided at the moment, and need some research first. Please add your notes, whenever you find yourself doing a little bit of that research or stumbling upon any facts that might be useful here! |
Revision as of 19:33, 30 November 2014
Contents
Summary
Eventually, we'll likely want to set up a legal entity in a country of our choosing, in order to be able to conduct business in the plain old business environment/bureaucracy set up by the world's nation states.
Both the general (shareholding etc.) concepts for founding this company, as well as their specific implementation are undecided at the moment, and need some research first. Please add your notes, whenever you find yourself doing a little bit of that research or stumbling upon any facts that might be useful here!
Needs
- Everybody has different levels of time to invest and continuous commitment they can offer. Shareholding should be flexible to accommodate that, both in the beginning as well as continuously.
- If possible, it'd be nice to be able to give (esp. early) outside contributors a part of the potential success as well. Possibly through crypto tokens, redeemable as stock options e.g.
- Whatever we come up with should be rather simple and understandable by everyone. If it's not possible for everyone to understand the agreement itself or its technical implementation (concept), then that must be considered a failure.
- Funding schemes will obviously influence this topic as well
Technical implementation
Notes
- Counterparty
- Signing contracts
- Multi-signature transaction (OP-NOP) with hash of document content, signed with everyone's private key
- Various options for enforcement / making sure a signing key is actually that person
Legal implementation
Jurisdiction
There are many nations in the world, but we'll have to choose at least one initially. Let's collect some notes on options.
Countries
Country | TLD | Corp tax | Currency | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Isle of Man | .im | 0% | IMP/GBP |
|